By
Robert W. Mann, M.A.
and
Douglas H. Ubelaker,
Ph.D.
Physical Anthropologists Department of Anthropology Smithsonian
Institution, Washington, D.C.
This Article Originally Appeared in the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, July 1990. Pictures from OsteoInteractive were added.
In recent years, just as the investigation of a crime scene has become more complex and sophisticated, so has the task of the forensic anthropologist. Forensic anthropologists assist medical and legal specialists to identify known or suspected human remains.
The science of forensic anthropology includes archeological excavation; examination of hair, insects, plant materials and footprints; determination of elapsed time since death; facial reproduction; photographic superimposition; detection of anatomical variants; and analysis of past injury and medical treatment. However, in practice, forensic anthropologists primarily help to identify a decedent based on the available evidence.
For example, when a skeleton found in a wooded area is brought to a morgue or an anthropologist's laboratory for examination, the first step is to determine whether the remains are human, animal, or inorganic material. If human, an anthropologist then attempts to estimate age at death, racial affiliation, sex, and stature of the decedent.
If the skeleton shows evidence of prolonged burial or is accompanied by coffin nails or arrow points, it usually represents an historic or prehistoric burial rather than a recent death. Construction crews frequently unearth such skeletons during road or housing excavations. After combining all of the evidence, the anthropologist determines the skeleton's possible significance to medical and legal authorities.
Although the primary task of anthropologists is to establish the identity of a decedent, increasingly they provide expert opinion on the type and size of weapon(s) used and the number of blows sustained by victims of violent crime. It should be noted, however, that forensic pathologists or related experts in forensic medicine determine the cause or manner of death, not the forensic anthropologist.
Most anthropologists have advanced degrees in anthropology and have examined hundreds of remains. They are also thoroughly familiar with human anatomy and how it varies in different populations. Some anthropologists may also have experience in police science or medicine, as well as in serology, toxicology, firearms and toolmarks identification, crime scene investigation, handling of evidence, and photography. A limited number of anthropologists deal with footprint analysis and species identification of carrion insects in relation to estimating time elapsed since death.
Perhaps the anthropologist's most valuable skill is familiarity with subtle variations in the human skeleton. Although most adult skeletons have the same number of bones (206), no two skeletons are identical. Therefore, observations of patterns or unique skeletal traits frequently lead to positive identifications. The most frequently used method for identification is to compare before- and after-death dental photoimages. If such photoimages do not exist, or if they are unavailable, then old skeletal injuries or anatomical skeletal variants revealed in other photoimages may provide the comparative evidence necessary to establish a positive identification.
Suppose hunters find a partially clothed skeleton lying on the ground in a heavily wooded area with much of its clothing torn and scattered by carnivores. Law enforcement officers are called to the scene, as is the medical examiner or nonphysician coroner. The scene is photographed in detail, and the skeleton is examined and photographed before being removed to the city morgue.
At the morgue, the medical examiner examines the remains for evidence of trauma, such as stab marks in the shirt, blunt trauma to the skull and mandible, and broken bones. Photoimages and photographs of the body show that no bullets or pellets having been noted. Also, examination of the clothing reveals no wallet or other personal identification.
The medical examiner determines through measurement of the pubic area that the remains are those of a middle-aged adult male. There is no evidence of facial or head hair to aid in determining racial affiliation. From measurements taken at the scene, the examiner roughly estimates the stature. Also, a forensic odontologist is called in to take dental photoimages. Although the decedent has a number of large dental cavities, he shows no restorations or evidence of having seen a dentist. At this point, the medical examiner requests assistance from a forensic anthropologist, who conducts further study of the remains in the laboratory.
The forensic anthropologist's examination confirms the medical examiner's findings that the individual is a middle-aged male. However, questions remain that the forensic anthropologist must answer, such as:
The question of racial affiliation is difficult to answer because, although racial classification has some biological components, it is based primarily on social affiliation. Nevertheless, some anatomical details, especially in the face, often suggest the individual's race. In particular, white individuals have narrower faces with high noses and prominent chins. Black individuals have wider nasal openings and subnasal grooves. American Indians and Asians have forward-projecting cheekbones and specialized dental features.
Examination of this skeleton reveals traits consistent with white racial affiliation. Further examination of the skull produces a few strands of straight blonde hair. Microscopic examination shows the hair to be consistent with that of a white person.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
These two mandibles are compared for the extent of ramus inversion. Negroids exhibit moderate to pronounced inversion in the area midway up the posterior edge of the ramus. Males are more prominant than females in this feature. Caucasoids and Mongoloids show little or no inversion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Being able to see the oval window through the external auditory meatus on a dry cranial specimin has recently been discovered to be of some importance in differentiating between Caucasoid and American Indian, or Mongoloid skeletal remains (Birkby, Walter H., Napoli, Michelle L., Maxwell Papers #4, 1992 ). The window is seen because the opening of the meatus is longer and wider in Caucasoids.
|
![]() |
Retention of the metopic suture is generally a caucasoid trait. This suture is present in the fetus as the cranial bones are forming but usually becomes obliterated as the skull develops |
Caucasoids generally have parabolic to elliptic shaped palates. Although it cannot be seen here, the palatine suture in caucasoids bulges
|
Usually, examination of the pubic bone, sacroiliac joint, amount of dental wear, cranium, arthritic changes in the spine, and microscopic studies of bones and teeth narrows the age estimate given by the anthropologist. After examining the skeleton, these indicators suggest that the man was between 35 and 45 years of age at the time of death.
Estimation of stature can be narrowed by measuring one or more complete long bones, preferably a femur or tibia. If stature estimates are based on incomplete long bones, less confidence can be placed in them. This measurement of the maximum length of the bone can then be plugged into a formula based on race and sex to produce an estimate. In this case the individual's stature was estimated at 5'7'' to 5'9'' with a mean stature of 5'8.''
| 0-5 years old | |
![]() |
Skull - gross : The calvarium is much larger in relation to the face and mandible at this stage in life. This is because the brain develops quite rapidly relative to dentition. The mandible and maxilla become larger as permanent molars begin to erupt. This occurs at approximately six years of age. This child is thought to be somewhere between the ages of 3 and 5 years old based on the stage of tooth eruption and calcification. The teeth are very important indicators of age in children this young because developmental patterns are well known. There is, however, some variation between populations as well as between the sexes. |
![]() |
Deciduous dentition : The stage of dental development seen here is approximately in the fifth year of life. The deciduous teeth are becoming more spaced, the first and second deciduous molars are fully erupted, and you can see the sixth year molars (1st permanent molars) beginning to come to the surface. The central incisors are the first teeth to be lost. |
![]() |
Long bone ossification : Age estimates for epiphyseal fusion rates in the long bones can be found in Johnston (1962) . Fusion of epiphyses in the humerus (as shown below) begins around age 17 and ends at approximately age 25. More specific information on epiphyseal fusion in the humerus can be found in McKern and Stewart (1957:44) |
![]() |
Subadult vertebra : There are three primary ossification centers and five secondary sites of development in the human vertebra. The centrum and two halves of the vertebral arch form as primary centers and are present at birth. During puberty, epiphyses appear at the tips of the transverse processes, the spinous process, and the superior and inferior surfaces of the vertebral body (epiphyseal rings). Fusion rates are variable with developmental completion occurring at approximately 25 years of age. |
18-23 years old |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Medial Clavicular Epiphysis |
|
30-40 (in progress) |
![]() |
60+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sex Determination
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Illustrated here are just three of the many differences exhibited between the male and female pelvis. Females generally have wide, broad greater sciatic notches (a). Adult females have moderate to deep preauricular sulci while males have little or no indentations in this area (b). The auricular surfaces in males are generally flat while females exhibit moderate to pronounced elevation (c). |
Estimating the time interval since death can be extremely difficult. For the most part, such an estimate is based on the amount and condition of soft tissue, such as muscle, skin, and ligaments present, the preservation of the bones, extent of associated plant root growth, odor, and any carnivore and insect activity. However, many other variables must also be considered, including the temperature at the time of death, penetrating wounds, humidity/aridity, soil acidity, and water retention. The longer the time since death, the more difficult it is to determine the time interval since death. In this hypothetical example, the anthropologist determined that the individual died 6 to 9 months previously, based largely on the condition of the soft tissue and the amount of root growth in the individual's clothing.
After the dirt and forest debris were removed from the bones using water and a soft brush, a number of faint cuts became visible in the left ribs and the mid-back. The number of discrete cuts in three ribs and in one vertebra suggest that this male was stabbed a minimum of three times. No additional evidence of trauma was noted.
The bullet entered from the fronto-lateral region of the right parietal bone, exiting superio-laterally through the left parietal. |
The wound caused by this 22 caliber bullet shows the inward beveling of the skull's outer table which is characteristic of entrance wounds |
This graphic illustrates the kind of secondary cranial fracturing that can occur with gunshot wounds. The cerebrospinal fluid surrounding the brain absorbs the force of the blast distributing shock waves throughout the endocranium. The resulting pressure causes this kind of fracturing from the inside out. |
The close proximity of the gun when fired caused this severe gunpowder burn inside the skull. |
The wound is located slightly to the left Of midline. The trajectory path of the bullet is downward and to the left exiting the occiptial region between the inferior nuchal line and foramen magnum. |
This is the exit wound explained in #3. The bullet exited the skull via the occipital bone (a). As it left the skull the bullet became lodged in the scalp and created this copper stain (b). |
Further examination revealed that the male sustained a fracture above his right eye and upper jaw bone at least several years before death. The individual also had a severely deviated nasal septum and presented evidence of a severe chronic nasal infection. This observation is noteworthy because if he sought medical help for the fractures or sinus condition, photoimages may have been taken that would provide an excellent opportunity for positive identification.
After the forensic anthropologist completes the examination, the medical examiner provides all information obtained from the skeleton to the law enforcement officials investigating the case. The information is then entered in the National Crime Information Center (NCIC).
In this hypothetical case, after several months, a search failed to locate a missing person matching this description. Therefore, the medical examiner and the detectives returned to the forensic anthropologist to request that a facial reproduction be attempted.
Two approaches are available to an anthropologist in reconstructing facial appearance during life. First, the anthropologist could work with a composite artist experienced in rendering sketches based on information supplied by eyewitnesses. Or, the anthropologist could call in a specialist in three-dimensional facial reproduction, a technique in which the head is constructed in clay directly over the skull and mandible or over good casts of them. Because of limited funds, and because an experienced composite artist is available on staff, the forensic anthropologist and artist worked together to produce a drawing of the person represented by the skeletal remains. This drawing was then made available to the public via the local media.
Shortly thereafter, two unrelated men who had seen the image on television came forward because they thought that it might be a relative. Medical and dental records for both individuals could not be located, but facial photographs taken within the last 2 years were available.
Using new techniques of photographic superimposition and comparison, the forensic anthropologist excluded one of the individuals outright. However, frontal photoimages of the second individual taken 3 years before death showed the individual was treated for facial injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The configuration of the frontal sinuses on the photoimages matched exactly the photoimages of the recovered skull, thereby positively identifying the victim.
A forensic anthropologist makes significant contributions to an investigation. The greatest of these could well be the anthropologist's intensive training and experience in distinguishing between human and nonhuman remains, determining age at death, racial affiliation, sex, stature, elapsed time since death, skeletal trauma, post-mortem damage and alteration of the skeleton, and establishing positive identification based on skeletal and dental evidence. Such information can be obtained from complete bodies or those partially destroyed by burning, air crashes, intentional mutilation and dismemberment, explosions, or other mass disasters. In fact, a forensic anthropologist is now an integral member of most mass disaster teams.
Through their anthropological training, most forensic anthropologists have knowledge of excavation techniques and mapping that are invaluable in recovering evidence. Consequently, the forensic anthropologist should participate in the investigation of the crime scene and, especially, in the recovery of human skeletal remains.
Many forensic anthropologists
offer their services to law enforcement agencies, coroners, and medical
examiners. However, if a law enforcement agency does not have access to a
forensic anthropologist, experienced experts can be found in many of the larger
universities, in anthropology museums throughout the United States, and in some
medical examiner's offices. It should be noted, however, that not all physical
anthropologists are qualified to practice forensic anthropology. A list of board
certified forensic anthropologists can be obtained from the American Academy of
Forensic Sciences. Forensic anthropologists have much to contribute to law
enforcement and would welcome the opportunity to assist in the successful
resolution of an investigation.
While the information presented here
is from reliable sources, there is no substitute for training or personal
experience. Before utilizing any technique described here, be sure and check
your local regulations and procedures. If you are in doubt as to which technique
to use or how to apply it, contact an expert in the field in question.
http://medstat.med.utah.edu/kw/osteo/forensics/